Indiana — Citizens have no right to stop police from entering their homes – ever.

Warrantless, with no probable cause needed.

This has MASSIVE implications nationwide, not just in Indiana.

Addition in the comments section.

Overturning a common law dating back to the English Magna Carta of 1215, the Indiana Supreme Court ruled Thursday that Hoosiers have no right to resist unlawful police entry into their homes.

In a 3-2 decision, Justice Steven David writing for the court said if a police officer wants to enter a home for any reason or no reason at all, a homeowner cannot do anything to block the officer’s entry.

“We believe … a right to resist an unlawful police entry into a home is against public policy and is incompatible with modern Fourth Amendment jurisprudence,” David said. “We also find that allowing resistance unnecessarily escalates the level of violence and therefore the risk of injuries to all parties involved without preventing the arrest.”

David said a person arrested following an unlawful entry by police still can be released on bail and has plenty of opportunities to protest the illegal entry through the court system.

A true police state.

Pitchforks, torches and The 2nd Amendment are next.

NorthWest link to the PDF of The Supreme Court ruling in Barnes v. State

Please scroll down into the comments for additions.

— — — — —

Kenny Solomon
Israel Survival Updates

10…… 9…… 8…… 7…………
Tool up…… It’s coming…… You know…… “It”.

Follow Israel Survival Updates On Twitter.

7 Responses to Indiana — Citizens have no right to stop police from entering their homes – ever.

  1. p0rkch0p says:

    The anti-4th Amendment Fascists on the IN Superb Court just put innocent law enforcement officers at great risk. Some law-abiding homeowners are prepared, 24/7, to defend their homes. Unjustified entries by the police will, emphasize WILL, result in justified shootings.

    The idiot “judges” who handed down this corruption of our Constitution deserve to be subjected, repeatedly, to the types of home-invasions they just sanctioned; hopefully, that will happen [no caviling and whining allowed].

    • kennysolomon says:

      Hi p0rkch0p – Thanks for checking in.

      This ruling is beyond the pale.

      I’m still not sure I can properly convey my thoughts without getting really ‘edgy’, because I stand with law enforcement in almost every circumstance.

      However, this court decision gives way to literal ‘home invasions’ by L.E. for any reason……. ANY reason…… Like if someone is a typical bitter clinger and the town and police union are rather blue about it.

      Bringing this before The SCOTUS, will take ‘an event’, as a person or group must be harmed by action resulting from a lower court ruling.

      It will also probably take years…… and who knows what The SCOTUS make up will be at the time.

      Kenny Solomon

  2. EastBayLarry says:

    Kenny I’m totally with on this one. It needs to be shouted from the rooftops.

    No reason required?! Are they telling us not to get the ‘establishment’ angry at us…or else?

  3. This one needs to go to SCOTUS. Hope it’s appealed.

  4. […] Indiana Supremes justify “illegal search and seizure.” […]

  5. Holly says:

    You awake yet?

  6. civil truth says:

    Here’s another danger: having entered illegally and removed the occupants, the police will be free to plant incriminating evidence of criminal activity without witnesses. While the homeowner may be able to have the evidence thrown out of court on the exclusionary principle, 1) this evidence will make it harder to claim illegal intent; and worse 2) the homeowner’s reputation in the community will be seriously or irreparably damaged, which no court action can undo – suspicion will always remain. Especially if the raid is deliberately timed to interrupt an embarrassing but not illegal activity.

    As noted earlier, the worst aspect will be the fear and intimidation element by civil authorities if police are free to enter one’s house at will.

    Not to mention that when the court sees fit to overturn 800 years of settled law under a “living constitution” interpretation, then nothing is settled law.

Have at it....... But please be respectful and no f'n cussin' neither, ya heah ?...... Also please back up all claims of fact in your comments with links (yes, they will be verified before comment posting approved).

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: